Author Topic: What are the common mistakes to avoid in CDR writing services?  (Read 25 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline elsasmith

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Age: 24
  • location: Australia
  • Country: au
  • Gender: Female
  • With us since: 12/07/2024
    • View Profile
Common mistakes in CDR writing services can significantly impact the outcome of your assessment by Engineers Australia. Avoiding these errors is crucial for a successful CDR:

Plagiarism: Copying content from the internet or other sources is strictly prohibited. Engineers Australia uses plagiarism detection software, so ensure all content is original and written in your own words.

Lack of Personal Contribution: Each Career Episode should highlight your specific role and contributions. Avoid general descriptions of team efforts or projects. Focus on what you personally did, the skills you applied, and the problems you solved.

Irrelevant Information: Stick to the facts and details that demonstrate your engineering competencies. Avoid including unnecessary background information or overly technical descriptions that do not showcase your skills.

Poor Structure and Formatting: Follow the Engineers Australia guidelines for structure and formatting. Each Career Episode should include an introduction, background, personal engineering activity, and a summary. Ensure the Summary Statement links accurately to the competencies mentioned in the Career Episodes.

Inadequate Evidence: Provide concrete examples and evidence of your engineering work. Vague or unsupported claims will weaken your CDR. Include details like project specifications, methodologies, and outcomes to substantiate your experiences.

 

Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 
All photo's & content within copyright © 2006-2017 WorldWide WaterGardeners and it's membership "All Rights Reserved"